4
My portfolio site went from 2 minutes to load to under 3 seconds
I mean, for like a year I just had this huge, beautiful hero video on my landing page. It looked cool in my head. But then I checked my analytics last month and saw a 90% bounce rate, people were leaving before it even loaded. I switched it out for a compressed, static image with the same vibe. Did it in an afternoon. The difference is insane, my contact form submissions went up the next week. Has anyone else had to kill a 'cool' feature that was just straight up broken?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
jessicab7021d ago
That bounce rate number is a gut punch, but honestly, it's the best teacher. I see a lot of people say they switched from video to an image, but they often skip the real fix. A 90% bounce means your server itself was probably too slow, not just the video file. A static image helps because it's smaller, but if the hosting is bad, you'll still have problems. You might want to check your Time to First Byte in a tool like WebPageTest. The real win was fixing the server delay, the image change just made that fix work.
9
Wow, that's a huge win. But honestly, the real lesson is about invisible choices. You picked a video because it felt 'premium', right? That's design thinking, not user thinking. A user just wants your page to work. We get so caught up in what looks good to us, we forget that a fast, boring page beats a broken, beautiful one every time. It's like choosing a fancy car that won't start over a regular one that gets you there.
6