22
PSA: Don't drop $50 on a color calibration tool without testing your screen first
I bought a SpyderX last month thinking it would fix my off-color prints. Turns out my monitor was already pretty close to correct, and the tool just made everything look weird. I spent 3 hours re-calibrating and still ended up returning it. If your prints look bad, check your lighting or your paper profile first. Does anyone else have a cheaper fix that actually works for matching screen to print?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
pipergonzalez3h ago
oh man I feel this so hard. I did the exact same thing with a ColorMunki last year and it drove me nuts for like a week before I figured out my issue was just a super bright desk lamp hitting my screen. The weird part is once I turned that off my monitor was actually fine and the calibration just made everything look dull and yellow. What ended up helping me more than anything was just using the free Windows calibration tool and matching by eye to a test print I held up next to the screen under normal room light. Also check if you have any kind of ambient light sensor turned on in your monitor settings that changes brightness automatically because that will mess with everything. Seriously though don't beat yourself up we all fall for the fancy gear trap sometimes when the problem is way simpler.
4
robert_bennett293h ago
Damn that's a good point about the ambient light sensor, I never even thought of that. I used to think those auto brightness things were just a gimmick that didn't really matter for calibration but now I'm wondering if that's what's been messing with my results too. I always went straight for the expensive gear thinking more money equals more accuracy but you're right that sometimes the simple fix is just turning off a setting or changing your lighting setup. Makes me want to try the Windows tool with a test print next time instead of dropping cash on a puck I'll barely use.
8